K 6 U ] $ Nitride Parameters%6Physical Constants for Transport Studies of the Group III-Nitrides

Table I: Nitride Parameters
 ? B%### 8&(((3<HHHC2NNNE2NNN9$NNN;$NNN:&=;>B&]<=P"@;@G-]<>5";;;;#<<<E/C==E/&=&E/&=&E/&<&@">>>A%LLL3'>==3'>==11@FG-1;;&3$PQW-$PQQ3%?@?/$L&&/->>&4%<:&,->==
 UnitsGaNAlNInN
Crystal Structure WurtziteWurtziteWurtzite
Densityg/cm36.15 [1]3.23 [1]6.81 [1]
Transverse Constant (Ct)dyn/cm24.42 x 1011 [1]4.42 x 1011 [1]4.42 x 1011 [1]
Longitudinal Constant (Cl)dyn/cm22.65 x 1012 [1]2.65 x 1012 [1]2.65 x 1012 [1]
Transverse Sound Velocitycm/s2.68 x 105 [2]3.70 x 105 [2]2.55 x 105 [2]
Longitudinal Sound Velocitycm/s6.56 x 105 [2]9.06 x 105 [2]6.24 x 105 [2]
Static Dielectric Constant 8.9 [3]8.5 [1]15.3 [3]
High Frequency Dielectric Constant 5.35 [3] and [22]4.77 [1]8.4 [3]
Energy Gap (G Valley)eV3.39 [19]6.2 [20]1.89 [21]
Effective Mass (G Valley)me0.20 [3] and [22]0.48 [1]0.11 [3]
Deformation PotentialeV8.3 [1]9.5 [1]7.1 [1]
Polar Optical Phonon EnergymeV91.2 [1]99.2 [1]89.0 [1]
Piezoelectric Constant e14C/m2 0.375 [1]0.92 [4]0.375 [1]
Piezoelectric Constant e15C/m2 -0.58 [5] 
Piezoelectric Constant e31C/m2 -0.48 [5] 
Piezoelectric Constant e33C/m2 1.55 [5] 
Intervalley Coupling CoefficienteV91.2 [6]99.2 [6]89.0 [6]
Intervalley Deformation PotentialeV/cm1 x 109 [7]1 x 109 [7]1 x 109 [7]
Lattice Constant, aAngstr.3.189 [13]3.11 [13]3.54 [13]
Lattice Constant, cAngstr.5.185 [13]4.98 [13]5.70 [13]
Electron mobilitycm2/Vs1000 [14] 135 [15] 3200 [16]
Hole mobilitycm2/Vs30 [13]14 [13] 
Saturation velocitycm/s2.5 x 107 [14]1.4 x 107 [15] 2.5 x 107 [16]
Peak velocitycm/s3.1 x 107 [14]1.7 x 107 [15]4.3 x 107 [16]
Peak velocity fieldkV/cm150 [14]450 [15]67 [16]
Breakdown fieldV/cm>5 x 106 [13]  
Light hole massme0.259 [13]0.471 [13] 
Thermal ConductivityW/cmK1.5 [13]2 [13] 
Melting TempoC>1700 [13]3000 [13]1100 [13]
FExcept for the data in the table below, the zinc-blende GaN parameters/are taken equal to the wurtzite GaN parameters.

 &

Table II: Zinc-blende Specific Data
 >&%1 :'<11?3$O-$O3%>
 UnitsGaN (Zinc-blende)
Lattice Constant, aAngstr.4.52 [10]
Electron Mobilitycm2/Vs1500 [18]
Saturation velocitycm/s2.5 x 107 [18]
Peak velocitycm/s3.5 x 107 [18]
Peak velocity fieldkV/cm110 [18]
 !

Table III: Band Structure Data
 ? -;$++##,*!;@;@&.,<]<>&/.>%%%-*!#$#$&.,$$$$&*%%A'%&/.$$$$,*!#$#$&.,$$$$&*%%'%%&/.$$$$
  UnitsGaN (Cubic)GaN (Wurtz)AlNInN
Gamma ValleyEnergy GapeV3.2 [10]3.39 [19]6.2 [20]1.89 [21]
 Effective Massme0.15 [11]0.20 [3] and [22]0.48 [1]0.11 [3]
 NonparabolicityeV-10.213 [12]0.1890.0440.419
Second ValleyEnergy GapeV4.75.296.94.09
 Effective Massme1.001.001.001.00
 Degeneracy 3 (X)1 (G')6 (L-M)1 (A)
 NonparabolicityeV-10.000.000.000.00
Third ValleyEnergy GapeV6.05.497.24.49
 Effective Massme1.001.001.001.00
 Degeneracy 4 (L)6 (L-M)2 (K)1 (K)
 NonparabolicityeV-10.000.000.000.00
GThe energy gaps of the second and third valleys were obtained by takingIthe differences between the upper valley conduction band minimums and theIgamma valley minimum (taken from Ref. [9]) and addingGthem to the energy gap of the gamma valley. The degeneracy of the upperOvalleys were obtained from Ref. [9] also. Due to variationsGin band structure calculations, the effective mass of the upper valleysFis set to the mass of the free electron and the nonparabolicity of theHupper valleys is set to zero. The nonparabolicity of the gamma valley is9calculated using the Kane model [12].C

 \C

References]H

[1] V. W. L. Chin, T. L. Tansley, and T. Osotchan,&J. Appl. Phys. 75, 7365 (1994).F

[2] The transverse sound velocity is calculated-from the transverse constant and the density:iQ

Vt = Sqrt(Ct/r)
"P

Similarly the longitudinal sound velocity is calculated from the longitudinal constant:TR

Vl = Sqrt(Cl/r).
F

[3] S. N. Mohammad and H. Morkoc, Prog. Quant. Electron. 20, 361 (1996).I

[4] This value is calculated as an effective valuebJfor the zinc-blende structure based on the measured wurtzite piezoelectric(constants (see [5]).I

[5] John G. Gualtieri, John A. Kosinski, and Arthur"GBallato, IEEE Trans. Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics, and Frequency Control<41, 53 (1994).WH

[6] The intervalley coupling constant is assumedJto be the same energy as the polar optical phonon energy, an approximationwhich holds for GaAs [8]. I

[7] The intervalley deformation potential assumedsto be the same as GaAs [8].)N

[8] M. A. Littlejohn, J. R. Hauser, and T. H. Glisson,&J. Appl. Phys. 48, 4587 (1977).L

[9] W. R. L. Lambrecht and B. Segall, in PropertiesHof Group III Nitrides, No. 11 EMIS Datareviews Series, edited3by J. H. Edgar ( Inspec, London, 1994 ), Chapter 4.AG

[10] T. Lei, T. D. Moustakas, R. J. Graham, Y. He,I;and S. J. Berkowitz, J. Appl. Phys. 71, 4933 (1992).WJ

[11] M. Fanciulli, T. Lei, and T. D. Moustakas, Phys. Rev. B. 48, 15144 (1993).J

[12] The nonparabolicity is calculated from the KaneGModel. The energy of the G valley is assumedH/to be non-parabolic, spherical, and of the formII

h2k2/2m* = E(1/*+ aE),
O

where k denotes the wavevector, E represents the energy, m* is the effectiveNImass, and the non-parabolicity coefficient, a, is given by W

a = (1 - m*/me)2/Eg/ ,
F

where me and Eg denote the bare electron mass!and the energy gap, respectively. F

[13] Michael S. Shur and M. Asif Khan, Mat. Res.Bull. 22 (2), 44 (1997)."K

[14] U. V. Bhapkar and M. S. Shur, J. Appl. Phys.,r82 (4), 1649 (1997).NF

[15] S. K. O'Leary, B. E. Foutz, M. S. Shur,JU.V. Bhapkar, and L. F. Eastman, Solid State Comm. 105, 621 (1998).F

[16] S. K. O'Leary, B. E. Foutz, M. S. Shur,FU.V. Bhapkar, and L. F. Eastman, J. Appl. Phys. 83, 826 (1998).M

[17] Jan Kolnik, Ismail H. Oguzman, Kevin F. Brennan,9FRongping Wang, P. Paul Ruden, and Yang Wang, J. Appl. Phys. 78, 1033 (1995).Q

[18] Unpublished. For means of comparison GaN Zinc-blende Htransport data was calculated using the same Monte Carlo program used toGcalculate the transport data from Refs. [14-16].DJ

[19] H. P. Maruska and J. J. Tietjen, Appl. Phys.Lett. 15, 327 (1969).F

[20] W. M. Yim, E. J. Stofko, P. J. Zanzucchi, J.FI. Pankove, M. Ettenburg, and S. L. Gilbert, J. Appl. Phys. 44, 292 (1973).iK

[21] T. L. Tansley and C. P. Foley, J. Appl. Phys.1